27.
99
but farmers; this is important as bearing the question whether the witucesce
-pere ever
on board the juck,
Buch the most serious objections
against the reception of the
reception of the evidence of
these two wow Cheng A Fung
Cheung Tuing
care that they
to cre
or
accomplices, that their evidence is not corroborated cuid that pressure intimidation has been brought to bear
tticus.
expon
That they
were accomplices is, Iow
think, clearly proved from their own
statement, Cheung
Fung says
"I have
"Keown defondant along time, defendant
" has a boat and follown piracy.
مرکز
" 30
Iwas
days in defendant's book " True it
is that in his first exausination, he
first
said I did not know it was a piratical
went
juck when Iwout on board, best he
کریا
also
"Iknew
28175
before,
that sometimes
"he
was a trader, and souatives a pirate:
Aud
گر هم
I just before he had stated, "we were
tão arid carried to ce
" pirated
In fai
"cargo."
- fairures to the cintureses I think
that their statement should be
e judged
said on
only according to what they the occasion of their secondexamination as great objections aguiust the competency of the 1. ncterpreter were whitstell? Chlinger appear to have.
Were Mita de
a very competent
Chung Tiong says he know
rocured from his childhood; he comes
from the
t
and
village; he is a
boatuan
& follour piracy; he has a junt.
piratical jente -
be
22
Ithink there can
doubt, they both knew that Fc.
jink
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.